What occurs when a "typical" characteristic is referred to as a "defining" characteristic?

When a "typical" characteristic is referred to as a "defining" characteristic, it signifies a shift in understanding about that trait's importance and role. A defining characteristic is one that is essential to the identity or essence of something, while a typical characteristic may merely be common or expected, and not essential. This reclassification often results in creating a hybrid—elements of what is considered typical now intermingle with those characteristics understood to be defining.

This change can lead to new interpretations and applications, blending various traits to create something that embodies both common features and essential elements. Thus, the outcome of recognizing a characteristic in this way is that it can create hybrid forms, mixing the established qualities of a project or entity with what is now seen as critical or core to its identity. Hence, the re-categorization leads to a nuanced understanding of how these characteristics work together, acting on a level that adds depth and creates something new or integrated.